Pune - India
Whole Foods by contrast had 2016 annual sales of roughly $15.72 billion, just 2.3 percent U.S. grocery sales. Amazon average sales per store, of which there are 430, are $36.6 million. Amazon already has roughly $15 billion in on-line food and beverage sales, so the purchase of Whole Foods could take Amazon grocery revenues over $30 billion, which puts them in the top five of the fragmented U.S. grocery market. But at what cost?
Amazon’s primary focus is the Whole Foods chain of 430 stores, which brings an established grocery distribution network to the Amazon on-line juggernaut. Whole Foods stores are in upscale demographics that match many of Amazon’s targeted demographics. From this perspective, Amazon is plugging the Whole Foods bricks and mortar stores into its well-established on-line empire to gain market share in the grocery industry. Using the Whole Foods distribution network in conjunction with Amazon’s on-line scale should drive costs and price points down and capture market share.
Is this a smart Amazon acquisition from that vantage point? The average cost to open a new Whole Foods store is roughly $7.5 million. Amazon’s purchase price works out to about $32 million per store; a premium of $24.5 million per location. Amazon could open its own store/distribution centers of course and they probably could build them for far less than $7.5 million each.
If Amazon’s main premise in acquiring Whole Foods is to expand its distribution network to drive its online grocery business, the $25 million premium per store would appear to be much more than a rounding error.
A recent report by Food Marketing Institute and Nielsen Online projects that American consumers could spend $100 billion on food-at-home items by 2025. Just how much of this $100 billion can Amazon capture? And how much of this captured revenue will be cannibalized out of its own Whole Foods chain?
Conclusion: Amazon overpaid for Whole Foods. But then, they can.
Blog author: Richard Wottrich
What is reality? Is the photo above a photo? The elephant is a plastic 3D printed figure. The gladiator is video streaming via Netflix. The backdrop is projected. The manikins are positioned to emulate a crowd. Or is it a smart phone image processed by an Intel chip?
The Technological Singularity is usually espoused as the supposed triumph of artificial intelligence (AI) over humans. In this definition AI ‘evolves’ via repetitive self-improvement. AI becomes capable of replicating ever superior iterations of ‘itself’ and coordinating that ability with other machines and robots. But is the Technological Singularity that point in time when humans perceive and believe that they can no longer control AI ‘evolution’ and indeed are subservient to AI?
The Cloud = humans aggregating demand = point-to-point distribution = the surrender of individual autonomy to a collective technology matrix = equals less human control. Ergo the Technological Singularity and our fear thereof.
Technology is accelerating vis-à-vis Moore’s Law headlong directly at humanity racing from the opposite direction to remove risk from everyday life. The point of impact is the Singularity.
As technology advances rapidly the entire concept of data centers will change, as Cloud systems leap into satellite networks, electricity transmitted by air, use of light instead of electricity in computers, and into quantum bio-computing systems emulating the human brain. The iterations are unknown unknowns. To think we can control this evolution is a particular conceit of humans.
Benjamin Franklin wrote the following singular observation for the Pennsylvania Assembly in its Reply to the Governor (November 11, 1755), “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
The result of the May 7 presidential election in France was the victory of the centrist liberal Emmanuel Macron. He was employed from 2008 to 2012, by the Rothschild & Co. investment bank, which is the equivalent of Goldman Sachs in elitist circles absent a family heritage stretching back centuries. Macron was known there as a rainmaker – nicknamed a “Mozart of finance.” His primary skill lay in reaching out to potential clients within his own elevated circle. Which is to say that absolutely nothing will change in France over the next five years that threatens that elite circle in any fundamental way. Which is to say that the European Union will continue on its present track, enabling Germany to dominate the entirety of Europe.
“If you are lucky enough to have lived in [the French elite] as a young man, then wherever you go for the rest of your life, it stays with you, for [the French elite are] a moveable feast.” Ernest Hemingway
President Dennis Kweicinski and immediate past CFO Maxine Harmatta present CEO and Chairman of the Board Bob Sloss with a plaque commemorating 45 years with Connor Manufacturing Services in Portland, Oregon this past May 24th.
Headquartered in California’s Silicon Valley, with wholly-owned manufacturing facilities in North America, SE Asia and China, Connor Manufacturing has a unique global footprint that is positioned to employ any or all of its resources toward the clients project, resulting in maximum efficiency through all the pre-project planning and design, engineering, material management and quality control stages. With the disciplined mindset of safety, quality and service, Connor creates a “value proposition” within the market place for every client.
This “value proposition” relates to innovative rapid response and speed to market, product price sensitivity, and ease of doing business that Connor clients come to expect. This dynamic results from Connors internal philosophy which was founded on the importance of the employee and how they are treated. Creating a better work place attracts better employees. Creating an environment where convictions of a strong work ethic and fairness carry from employee, to supplier to the client and promotes an atmosphere of success for all. These are the principles that Connor’s success was founded upon over 100 years ago.
Richard Wottrich, Board of Directors, Connor Manufacturing – CEO and Senior Consultant, International Services, DSI Global View, Atlanta, USA
Wikipedia – NASA’s Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission is an ongoing robotic space mission involving two Mars rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, exploring the planet Mars. It began in 2003 with the sending of the two rovers: MER-A Spirit and MER-B Opportunity—to explore the Martian surface and geology. Both rovers outlived their planned missions of 90 Martian solar days by far. MER-A Spirit was active until 2010. MER-B Opportunity is still active. The success of the two MERs led to another mission, sending a bigger rover Curiosity in 2012. #NASA
Is taking the road less traveled strategy or a tactic?
Benoit Mandelbrot first used the term ‘fractal’ in 1975. He discovered that simple mathematic rules apply to a universe of ‘realities’ that looked visually complex or chaotic.
`I see nobody on the road,’ said Alice.`I only wish I had such eyes,’ the King remarked in a fretful tone. `To be able to see Nobody! And at that distance, too! Why, it’s as much as I can do to see real people, by this light!’
DSI GLOBAL VIEW BLOG
- Amazon’s Rounding Error
- What is Reality?
- A Moveable Feast #DSIGlobal
- Connor Manufacturing Services Honors Bob Sloss, CEO and Chairman of the Board
- The Road Not Taken
- Fractal Universe – Random Life #Pollock
- The Illusion of Russian Power
- Strategy versus Tactics #Amsterdam
- Revisiting Drones
- Night Moves – Strategy versus Tactics
- The Government Pension Fund Global
- Order from Chaos #DSIGlobal